ASSESSMENT PRACTICE IN A LANGUAGE CENTER IN THE UANL
Barra lateral del artículo
Contenido principal del artículo
Resumen
Institutions from basic to higher education in Mexico that offer courses of English as a Foreign Language rely heavily on the administering of assessment, usually the type that is formal. However, the literature shows how important it is the involvement of other types of assessment in the classroom for effective language learning to take place. For instance, assessment for learning, which consist of a continuous assessment where learners receive feedback so greater learning occurs, what is more, it enables teachers to modify their teaching ways as they reflect on the learners’ progress. To show how assessment is carried out in our context, this research project focuses on a case study within the CAADI from FOD in the UANL.
Descargas
Detalles del artículo
Citas
Abedi, Jamal (2010). Performance assessment for English Language learners. California: Stanford Center for Opportunity Policy in Education.
Alvarez, L., Ananda, S., Walqui, A., Sato, E., & Rabinowitz, S. (2014). Focusing Formative Assessment on the Needs of English Language Learners. San Francisco: WestEd.
Bachman, L. F. & Palmer, A. S. ( 1996). Language testing in practice. New York: Oxford University Press.
Black Paul , Harrison Christine, Lee Clare, Marshall Bethan, and Wiliam Dylan (2004). Working inside the black box: assessment for learning in the classroom. Phi Delta Kappan, No. 1, vol. 86. PDK International, Arlington.
Blandéz, A. Julia (1996). La investigación-acción: Un Reto para el Profesorado. Guía Práctica para Grupos de Trabajo, Seminarios y Equipos de Investigación. Zaragoza: INDE Publicaciones.
Brown, H. D. & Abeywickrama, P. ( 2010). Language assessment, principles and classroom practices (2nd ed.). White Plains: Pearson Education, Inc.
Burns, Anne (1999). Collaborative Action-Research for English Language Teachers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Creswell, J. (2014). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative and Mixed Methods Approaches SAGE: USA
De Jesús García, Raúl Gabriel (2015). La evaluación en la enseñanza del inglés como lengua extranjera: hallazgos en la Escuela Normal de Atlacomulco. Revista de Educación y Desarrollo, No.32, Universidad de Guadalajara, Guadalajara.
Erickson, G. and Gustafsson, J. (2005). Some European Students’ and Teachers’ Views on Language Testing and Assessment. A Report on a Questionnaire Survey. Sweden: Göteborg University.
Ezir, Eli (2013). Assessment and Testing in ELT: the Difference Between Assessment and Testing. Yakarta.
Forbes México (2013). México se resiste a aprender inglés. November 05th. 2013. Online article. Retreived from: http://www.forbes.com.mx Viewed: June 02nd. 2015.
Frechtling, J. (2010). The 2010 User-Friendly Handbook for Project Evaluation. NSF
Gall, J., Gall, M., and Borg, W. (2005). Applying Educational Research. A Practical Guide. Boston: Pearson.
Garrison C. & Ehringhaus M. (n.d.) Formative and Summative Assessments in the Classroom. Dover: Measured Progress.
Gordon, E., McGill, M., Sands, D., Kalinich, K., Pellegrino, J., and Chatterji, M. (2014). Bringing formative classroom assessment to schools and making it count” Quality Assurance in Education, Vol. 22, No. 4 pp. 339-352.
Hamayan, Else (1995). Approaches to alternative assessment. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, No. 15, Cambridge University Press.
Hollingworth, Liz (2007). Five Ways to Prepare for Standardized Tests Without Sacrificing Best Practice. The Reading Teacher, Vol. 61, No. 4 pp. 339-342.
Hughes, Arthur (2003). Testing for Language Teachers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Jones, Cheryl A. (2005). Assessment for Learning. Liverpool: Learning and Skills Development Agency.
Kemmis, Stephen and Robin McTaggart (1988). The Action Research Planner. (3rd edition). Australia: Deakin University Press.
Linan-Thompson, S. (2010). Response to Instruction, English Language Learners and Disproportionate Representation: The Role of Assessment. Psicothema, Vol. 22, No. 4 pp. 970-974.
López, Alexis A. (2010). La evaluación formativa en la enseñanza y aprendizaje del inglés. Voces y Silencios, No. 2, vol. 1. Colombia: Universidad de los Andes.
Madsen, Harold S. (1983). Techniques in Testing. New York: Oxford University Press.
Maxwell, Graham (2001). Teacher Observation in Student
Assessment. Brisbane: Queensland School Curriculum.
Council. assess. (2016) in Merriam-Webster.com. Retrieved
on February 02, 2016, from: http://www.merriam- webster.com/dictionary/assess.
Mexicanos Primero (2015). Sorry. El aprendizaje de inglés en México. Mexicanos Primero Visión 2013, A. C., México.
Moss, Connie M. (2013). Research on Classroom Summative Assessment. McMillan, James H. SAGE Handbook of Research on Classroom Assessment. SAGE Publications, Inc.
Parker, Peter, Fleming, P., Beyerlein, S., Apple, D. and Krumsieg, K. (2001). Differentiating Assessment from Evaluation as Continuous Improvement Tools. Proceedings- Frontiers in Education Conference. Vol. 1.
Powell-Davies, Philip (2011). New directions: assessment and evaluation. A collection of papers. England: British Council.
Ramírez Romero, José Luis (2013). Diez años de investigación en enseñanza de lenguas extranjeras. México: Pearson Educación.
Rose, S., Spinks, N. & Canboto, A. (2015). Management Research: Applying the Principles. New York: Routledge.
Thornton, John G. (2009). Learning English as a second language in South Korea: Perceptions of 2nd year college and university students and their English speaking instructors. The University of Southern Queensland.
UANL (2015). Modelo Educativo de la UANL. Retrieved from:
http://mediasuperior.uanl.mx/00/modelo-educativo.pdf
Waterloo Region District School Board (2013). Assessment, Evaluation and Reporting Handbook Grades 9 to 12. Ontario: Waterloo Region District School Board.
Wisconsin Center of Education Research (2009). WIDA Focus on Formative Assessment. Madison: University of Wisconsin, Vol. 1, No. 10
Yoneda, Mitaka (2012). Designing Assessment Tools: The Principles of Language Assessment. Bull Mukogawa Women’s University Humanities and Social Science, Vol. 60,pp. 41-49.